President Obama Proclaims Saturday As 2011 "National Hunting And Fishing Day"

President urges citizens to go catch some wild food as he hails Administration's conservation efforts...
President Obama has hiked and biked with the First Family through some of America's most stunning National Parks since taking office. He's had one fishing outing, when he donned waders and went after trout on the East Gallatin River near Belgrade, Montana, in August of 2009. This afternoon, the Angler in Chief issued a Proclamation declaring tomorrow, Saturday, Sept. 24th, National Hunting and Fishing Day 2011. There's a foodie moment in the Proclamation as the President urges citizens to pick up their cross bows and rifles, their fishing gear and nets, and get outdoors looking for some wild sustenance. (Above: The Presidential fishing guide reacts as President Obama *almost* hooks a big one in the East Gallatin)

"We have long depended on this land to sustain us, from our Native American ancestors and the settlers on the Eastern Seaboard to the sportsmen and women of today," President Obama writes. "I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate programs and activities."

Conservation funding slashed in deficit proposal...
But the Proclamation is primarily about the importance of conservation, and comes on the heels of the President's new deficit reduction plan, unveiled on Monday, which calls for slashing USDA's budget for conservation initiatives by $2 billion over 10 years. That's $200 million annually.

"Today, we continue the essential work of conserving and sustaining our precious environment," President Obama writes, and points to the America's Great Outdoors Initiative, launched last year, as well as the recently established Federal Interagency Council on Outdoor Recreation, as beneficial programs.

The deficit plan has some conservation advocates worried.  The Administration says that despite the proposed cuts, conservation funding is projected to grow by $60 billion over the next decade, and notes that the private sector must get involved, too.

The President's Proclamation:

Office of the Press Secretary
___________________________

For Immediate Release September 23, 2011

NATIONAL HUNTING AND FISHING DAY, 2011

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A PROCLAMATION

On vast plains and through dense forests, along rocky riverbanks and atop tranquil lakes, Americans of every age and background cherish their connection to the great outdoors. As we mark National Hunting and Fishing Day, we are reminded of the uniquely American idea that each of us has an equal share in the land around us and an equal responsibility to protect it.

America's hunters and anglers directly experience the endless beauty and reward of our Nation's bounty. We have long depended on this land to sustain us, from our Native American ancestors and the settlers on the Eastern Seaboard to the sportsmen and women of today. Fishing and hunting are traditions that span untold lengths of time, enabling important bonds to the land and between generations to form. Sportsmen also develop unique connections to the land they enjoy, and hunters and fishermen were some of our first conservationists. These relationships are preserved and passed on with pride, along with a deep and abiding respect for nature.

Today, we continue the essential work of conserving and sustaining our precious environment. Our landscapes are not only a source of pleasure, but a valuable resource for our local economies and the livelihood of many across America. Last year, after an unprecedented public engagement effort, with input from across our country, my Administration launched the America's Great Outdoors Initiative. Through this initiative, we are working to meet the unique challenges of environmental stewardship in the 21st century and create community-based solutions for conservation.

As part of the America's Great Outdoors Initiative, we recently established the Federal Interagency Council on Outdoor Recreation to assist with promoting outdoor recreational activities for American families on public lands. By coordinating with State, local, and tribal governments, and other stakeholders, the Council aims to connect our families, and especially our youth, to the rugged beauty of the natural wonders our Nation's hunters and anglers know so well.

Protecting the conservation legacy of our past is the responsibility of all Americans. Working together, we can preserve the wonder of nature while building a future where all Americans are able to enjoy and share in her bounty.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 24, 2011, as National Hunting and Fishing Day. I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate programs and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-third day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand eleven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-sixth.

BARACK OBAMA

##

*Photos by Pete Souza/White House. The President was with fishing guide Dan Vermillion in the photos, taken on Aug. 14, 2009.

read more "President Obama Proclaims Saturday As 2011 "National Hunting And Fishing Day""

Vilsack Blogs About Obama's Deficit Plan

Transcript: No mention of proposal to eliminate Direct Payments to farmers... 
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack issued no statement on Monday after President Obama released his deficit reduction plan, which includes a proposal for some big changes and cuts to USDA programs. Instead, Vilsack today published a post on both the White House and USDA blogs, re-assuring America's hardworking farmers, ranchers and growers that the plan is good for the nation. The President's plan, Vilsack wrote, is bipartisan, and "sets us on a path to compete by asking everyone to pay their fair share, while investing in the innovation and economic opportunities we need to win the future." (Above: Vilsack holds a copy of the American Jobs Act, which is paid for under the President's proposal)

"The plan will strengthen our disaster assistance programs," Vilsack wrote. "After witnessing flood, drought, hurricanes, tornadoes and wildfires this year – I am even more certain of the importance of this component of the safety net."

Vilsack also praises plans to streamline crop insurance programs, as well as reduce federal subsidies to these, and he notes that the three percent budget cut proposed for conservation programs "challenges us to leverage our still-significant investments in conservation to attract more private sector investment."  But the Secretary doesn't mention the elimination of Direct Payments to farmers, which could be the most contentious part of the President's proposal.

The Administration says more than 50 percent of Direct Payments go to farmers who earn $100,000 or more annually, whether or not they actually grow crops, and eliminating these payments will save $3 billion annually.

Direct Payments "a lot of times pay large farms for crops that they don't grow," President Obama said on Monday.

"Taxpayers continue to foot the bill" for farmers who "are experiencing record yields and prices," the Administration notes in the text of the President's plan.

Asking high-income Americans to "pay their fair share" is something the President and Administration officials have repeated over and over in recent weeks.

"This is not class warfare. It’s math," President Obama said on Monday. "The money is going to have to come from someplace. And if we’re not willing to ask those who've done extraordinarily well to help America close the deficit and we are trying to reach that same target of $4 trillion, then the logic, the math says everybody else has to do a whole lot more."

Under that thinking, eliminating Direct Payments is not Agri-class warfare, it's math.

The President's proposal got trounced on Monday in a joint statement from Representative Frank Lucas (R-OK), Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, and Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS), Ranking Member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, but they didn't mention the elimination of Direct Payments, either. Download the President's full plan [PDF].

Vilsack's full blogpost:

Lessons From The Farm To Strengthen America

A week ago, President Obama released the American Jobs Act, a specific plan to jumpstart our economy and put Americans to work today. It contains ideas that both parties in Washington have supported. And yesterday, he laid out a plan that will pay for it – and for other long-term investments we need to stay competitive – while reducing our deficits.

His plan takes a balanced approach. It looks for savings across government. And it asks everyone to do their part and pay their fair share so we can live within our means.

For agriculture, the plan focuses on what the President and I believe is one of the most pressing challenges facing producers right now: maintaining a strong safety net and disaster assistance programs that will work for all farmers and ranchers, no matter what they produce or where.

The plan will strengthen our disaster assistance programs, which are currently set to run out of funding at the end of the month. It means that farmers knocked down by natural disaster can get their operations back on track. After witnessing flood, drought, hurricanes, tornadoes and wildfires this year – I am even more certain of the importance of this component of the safety net.

By modernizing our crop insurance program and making modest changes to the subsidy that crop insurance companies receive, we’ll make sure that we improve the programs and implement them more efficiently.

The plan proposes reducing conservation funding by 3 percent to help control the deficit. But it challenges us to leverage our still-significant investments in conservation to attract more private sector investment so we don’t lose ground in our effort to conserve soil and water resources.

Farmers and ranchers have worked over the years – especially following the farm crisis of the 1980s – to reduce their debt but thrive by investing wisely, adapting, innovating, and cutting back when necessary. Agriculture shows us that by investing wisely and cutting wisely, we can grow the economy for the long term, and get our country’s fiscal house in order.

The President’s plan follows that mold. It will invest to create jobs now, maintaining a strong safety net and creating a better market for our agricultural goods. And it sets us on a path to compete by asking everyone to pay their fair share, while investing in the innovation and economic opportunities we need to win the future.
##

*USDA photo by by Christopher Rolinson/StartPoint Media, Inc, taken at Point Park University in Pittsburgh, PA, on Friday, September 16, 2011.

read more "Vilsack Blogs About Obama's Deficit Plan"

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition Responds To President Obama's Deficit Plan

Today the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition issued a statement about President Obama's proposed cuts and changes to agriculture programs, unveiled Monday as part of his deficit reduction plan. The NSAC is an alliance of grassroots organizations that advocates for federal policy reform to advance the sustainability of agriculture, food systems, natural resources, and rural communities. Policy Director Ferd Hoefner issued the statement, which includes a letter [PDF] that will be sent to the Super Committee, as well as a nine-page document that details NSAC's 2012 Farm Bill Platform [PDF]. The GOP Ag response IS HERE.

NASC's statement:

Washington, D.C. September 20, 2011 -- The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition urged the congressional deficit reduction or super committee today to take a policy and reform-oriented approach to reducing total farm bill spending while renewing investments in underfunded areas including new farmers, rural development, conservation, renewable energy, agricultural research, and new market development.

The NSAC letter to the Committee urged them to resist further cuts to farm conservation beyond the $2 billion Congress has already cut since the 2008 Farm Bill, to place hard caps on farm commodity and crop and revenue insurance subsidies, to end subsidies for the conversion of prime grasslands, to renew funding for critical mandatory farm bill programs that have no secured baselines after the end of the current farm bill cycle in 2012, and to protect anti-hunger programs from cuts.

A more detailed nine page document accompanies the letter and includes the full scope of the NSAC farm bill budget proposal.

NSAC Policy Director Ferd Hoefner contrasted the NSAC view with the farm bill cuts proposed by President Obama yesterday:

The Obama proposal holds promise, especially in the call for the end of direct payments. The farm bill cuts the President offered, however, are disproportionate to the size of the farm bill budget relative to total federal mandatory spending. In addition to the unfair size of the cut, the Administration proposal has three other problems.

First, the Administration would cut direct payments without offering a new alternative safety net proposal, even while proposing to leave a largely failed disaster program in place at a very substantial total cost equaling roughly half of the total savings. Disaster assistance should be built into the new safety net at a significantly lower cost, and eliminated as a free-standing program.

Second, all of the subsidies they do propose to leave in place are available without any effective limit on the size of the subsidy any one farm can receive. As such, they would focus the cuts on small and mid-sized farms, while allowing the largest farms continued access to the loopholes currently written into law to largely avoid the cuts that apply to everyone else.

Third, they do not take account of the dire need to put money into farm, food, and rural programs that create jobs, new business opportunities, and new healthy food options but that have shrinking or soon to be non-existent budgets.

The NSAC proposals by contrast would keep farm bill cuts at more equitable levels, target cuts so that the largest and wealthiest farms would actually have to contribute to deficit reduction, and align spending policies with widely supported public values with respect to increasing farm and rural economic opportunity, conserving natural resources and protecting the environment, and improving access to healthy food.

##

read more "National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition Responds To President Obama's Deficit Plan"

Sen. Roberts, Rep Lucas Give GOP Response To Agriculture Proposals In Obama's Deficit Plan

"The President turns a deaf ear to America’s farmers"...
Representative Frank Lucas (R-OK), Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, and Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS), Ranking Member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, today issued a joint statement in response to President Obama's deficit reduction plan, which includes changes and cuts to agriculture programs that will reduce the deficit by $33 billion, according to the Obama Administration.

"The President’s policy priorities reveal a lack of knowledge of production agriculture and fail to recognize how wholesale changes to farm policy would impact the people who feed us," Lucas and Roberts said. "The President does nothing to address waste, fraud, abuse, and other integrity issues within nutrition programs, which account for 80 percent of USDA spending."

House Agriculture Committee Ranking Member Collin C. Peterson (D-Minn) and Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) did not issue statements about the President's plan.

Lucas and Roberts' full statement:

"The agriculture community remains willing to do its part in getting our fiscal house in order, but, in essence, President Obama’s plan for economic growth and deficit reduction is not credible.

The President’s policy priorities reveal a lack of knowledge of production agriculture and fail to recognize how wholesale changes to farm policy would impact the people who feed us. For example, cutting $8 billion from the crop insurance program puts the entire program at risk. We have heard again and again from producers that crop insurance is the best risk management tool available. In jeopardizing this program, the President turns a deaf ear to America’s farmers.

Meanwhile, SURE [the largest disaster aid program] has not worked as intended for most crops, but the President proposes extending it. The President only proposes a $2 billion cut, roughly three percent, to conservation despite his claim that conservation spending has increased 500 percent through the years. And, the President does nothing to address waste, fraud, abuse, and other integrity issues within nutrition programs, which account for 80 percent of USDA spending.

Ultimately, cuts to agriculture must reflect its diversity across the country, respect the challenges producers face, and preserve the tools necessary for food production."

##

read more "Sen. Roberts, Rep Lucas Give GOP Response To Agriculture Proposals In Obama's Deficit Plan"

President Obama's Deficit Reduction Plan Eliminates Federal Subsidies For Farmers

Five-part plan for agriculture/rural cuts and changes proposed, because "Taxpayers continue to foot the bill" for farmers who "are experiencing record yields and prices," the Administration says...
"Farmers represent the best of the American dream," President Obama declared on Friday. But this morning in the Rose Garden, the President revealed that farmers who have been living that dream with the help of federal agriculture subsidies will be out of luck under his new deficit proposal, which provides $2 trillion in changes to entitlement programs and tax increases over the next decade. Thanks to a booming Ag economy, Direct Payments to farmers are "no longer defensible" and will be eliminated, saving the Government $3 billion annually, according to the Administration. The President's plan also reduces subsidies to crop insurance companies; better targets agriculture conservation assistance; extends mandatory disaster assistance; and targets Medicare support for rural providers (all fully explained below). These measures will reduce the deficit by $33 billion, the Administration says. (Above: The President during his remarks)

"We reform agricultural subsidies--subsidies that a lot of times pay large farms for crops that they don't grow," President Obama said during his remarks. "We have to cut what we can’t afford to pay for what really matters."

The plan "pays for the President’s jobs bill and produces net savings of more than $3 trillion over the next decade, on top of the roughly $1 trillion in spending cuts that the President already signed into law in the Budget Control Act – for a total savings of more than $4 trillion over the next decade," the White House notes.

The President said that changing agriculture payments and other entitlements is crucial to balancing the budget and growing the economy; the plan, he said, "makes additional spending cuts that need to happen if we’re to solve this problem."

The President previously proposed capping agriculture subsidies in 2009, which was never enacted due to outrage from farm-state lawmakers and interest groups. Most recently, Mr. Obama discussed the need for capping ag subsidies during his Rural Economic Forum in August, in Iowa. Farmers who also happen to be millionaires will be subject to the President's proposed "Buffett Rule," a tax increase for those who earn more than seven figures annually, a crucial part of his plan to raise revenue. The President didn't offer details of the new rule, named for billionaire financier Warren Buffett, nor did Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner during a follow-up briefing with reporters. Download the President's full plan [PDF].

UPDATE, 5:30 PM: The GOP response to the agriculture proposals IS HERE.

1. Eliminating Direct Payments to farmers
Eliminating Direct Payments to farmers will save the government $3 billion annually, the Administration says, and calls these payments "no longer defensible" thanks to recent boom years in the agriculture sector, which includes a net farm income forecast that is 31 percent higher than the 2010 level.

"Taxpayers continue to foot the bill" for farmers who "are experiencing record yields and prices," the Administration notes in the plan.

Direct payments provide producers with fixed annual income support payments for having historically planted crops that were supported by Government programs, regardless of whether the farmer is currently producing those crops—or producing any crop. Direct payments do not vary with prices, yields, or producers’ farm incomes. More than 50 percent of direct payments go to farmers who earn $100,000 or more annually, the Administration notes, and among other problems, these payments make it difficult for new farmers to purchase land.

"In a period of severe fiscal restraint, these payments are no longer defensible," the Administration says.

The Administration defends eliminating direct payments to farmers by noting that "Farm income has been high and continues to increase, with net farm income forecast to be $103.6 billion in 2011, up $24.5 billion (31 percent) from the 2010 forecast—the highest infla- tion-adjusted value for net farm income recorded in more than 35 years. The top five earnings years for the past three decades have occurred since 2004, attesting to the profitability of farming this decade."

2. Reduce subsidies to crop insurance companies
Noting that "crop insurance is a foundation of our farm safety net," the Administration proposes "streamlining" administrative costs and changing the way crop insurance rates are calculated in order to save money. The Administration says that crop insurance is "highly subsidized" and costs the Government approximately $8 billion a year to run: $2.3 billion per year for the private insurance companies to administer and underwrite the program and $5.7 billion per year in premium subsidies to the farmers.

The President's proposal includes a four-pronged plan to trim this, with three points aimed at insurance companies, and one aimed at producers.

1. Lowering ROI: Crop insurance companies’ rate of return on investments should be reduced from 14 percent to 12 percent in order to save $2 billion over 10 years, according to the plan.

2. 2006 Cap level: Noting that the current cap on administrative expenses is based on 2010 premiums, which were among the highest ever, the Administration proposes a cap based on 2006 premiums.

"The Administration, therefore, proposes setting the cap at $0.9 billion adjusted annually for inflation, which would save $3.7 billion over 10 years."

3. More accurate pricing for CAT policies: The Administration proposes to price the premium for catastrophic (CAT) coverage policies more accurately, which will "slightly lower the reimbursement to crop insurance companies."

"The premium for CAT coverage is fully subsidized for the farmer, so the farmer is not im- pacted by the change. This change will save $600 million over 10 years."

4. Changing insurance subsidies for Producers: "Today, producers only pay 40 percent of the cost of their crop insurance premium on average, with the Government paying for the remainder," the Administration notes, and proposes to "shave two basis points off any coverage premium subsidy levels that are currently offered above 50 percent. This would save $2 billion over 10 years. Farmers who have premium subsidies of 50 percent or less would not be affected.

3. Better targeting for agricultural conservation assistance
The Administration proposes to slash conservation funding by $2 billion over 10 years by better targeting funding to the most cost-effective and environmentally beneficial programs and practices.

While noting that private sector conservation efforts need to be supported, the Administration says that the 500 percent increase in funding since the 2002 Farm Security and Rural Investments Act has "led to difficulties in program administration and redundancies among our agricultural conservation programs." High crop prices have strengthened market opportunities for farmers, as well as decreased the need for government to fund conservation initiatives.

"Even under this proposal, conservation assistance is projected to grow by $60 billion over the next decade," the Administration notes.

4. Target Medicare support for rural providers
The plan notes:

"Given the importance of Medicare to rural seniors, the program provides special payments to rural hospitals and doctors. Some of these payments, however, are not justified and threaten to undermine those that are. The proposal would better target Medicare’s Critical Access Hospital program and eliminate the new special add-on payments to providers in some, but not all, rural States – saving $6 billion over the next decade from the $60 billion Medicare is expected to spend on supplemental payments to rural providers."

5. Extend mandatory disaster assistance
To be eligible for federal farm disaster aid for crop losses related to weather, insects, or other catastrophes, farmers will be required to purchase crop insurance. The full text of this component:

"The Administration strongly supports disaster assistance programs that protect farmers in their time of greatest need. The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 provided producers with mandatory disaster assistance programs for the 2008 to 2011 crops. To strengthen the safety net, the Administration proposes to extend these programs, or similar types of disaster assistance that are of a similar cost, for the 2012 to 2016 crops.

The programs provide financial assistance to producers when they suffer actual losses in farm revenue, loss of livestock or the ability to graze their livestock, loss of trees in an orchard, and other losses due to diseases or adverse weather. To be eligible for the programs, farmers must purchase crop insurance. The Supplemental Revenue Assistance Program provides whole farm revenue coverage to farmers at a revenue level that is essentially 15 percent higher than their crop insurance guarantee. Payments are limited so that the guaranteed level cannot exceed 90 percent of expected farm income in the absence of a natural disaster."
##

The President's Rose Garden remarks:



*Photo by Pete Souza/White House

read more "President Obama's Deficit Reduction Plan Eliminates Federal Subsidies For Farmers"

OMB Warns Food Safety Funding Is Threatened Without Obama's Deficit Reduction Plan

"Drastic cuts" possible, says Jack Lew...
In a post on the White House blog this morning to explain President Obama's deficit reduction proposal, Jack Lew, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, warned that food safety funding could face "drastic cuts" if the President's plan to reshape America's tax structure and make cuts to other programs is not passed by Congress. The full details to changes proposed for the agriculture sector ARE HERE.

"If we don’t take a balanced approach to deficit reduction that includes asking the wealthiest 2 percent of families and big corporations to pay their fair share, then everyone else must shoulder the load," Lew wrote. "That could mean drastic cuts to things like education, research and development, infrastructure, and food safety; and could mean severe cuts to Medicare that would burden seniors with thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket costs."

Lew gives no hard details about anyone's plans for cutting food safety funding--"anyone" being the Republican party, which in general believes that food safety regulations are burdensome, expensive, and better left to the private sector, rather than to the federal government. The President signed the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act in January of 2011, which provided the Agency with broad new regulatory powers for food safety, the first changes since the 1930s. Funding the new requirements in the measure has been under debate by lawmakers for months, as FDA has slowly rolled out components, which includes more federal inspectors and increased testing and monitoring of America's food supply.

read more "OMB Warns Food Safety Funding Is Threatened Without Obama's Deficit Reduction Plan"

President Unveils New Deficit Reduction Plan: White House Fact Sheet

Proposal includes $33 billion in savings from cutting agriculture subsidies, payments, and programs...
UPDATE: The full details for proposed agriculture cuts ARE HERE
Ahead of President Obama's morning speech in the Rose Garden to unveil his new deficit reduction proposal, the White House released the following Fact Sheet with broad details. The President is sending this to the Super Committee, the bipartisan group of lawmakers charged with coming up with a deficit reduction plan before Thanksgiving. The President's plan pays for the American Jobs Act, and it includes "reforming agriculture subsidies," Mr. Obama said during his remarks. The White House Fact Sheet notes "$33 billion in savings from agriculture subsidies, payments, and programs," but gives no details about what this entails. President Obama discussed the need for capping agriculture subsidies during his Rural Economic Forum in August, in Iowa.

"Today I am laying out a set of specific proposals to finish what we started this summer," President Obama said.

The President's plan includes restructuring tax rates and closing loopholes, reforming Social Security and making "modest adjustments to Medicare and Medicaide" as well as cuts to other programs.

"Millionaires and billionaires have to pay their fair share" of taxes, the President said, once again referencing billionaire financier Warren Buffett's now-famous secretary.

The plan "pays for the President’s jobs bill and produces net savings of more than $3 trillion over the next decade, on top of the roughly $1 trillion in spending cuts that the President already signed into law in the Budget Control Act – for a total savings of more than $4 trillion over the next decade," the White House notes. The President's remarks:

White House Fact Sheet:
Living Within Our Means and Investing in the Future -
The President’s Plan for Economic Growth and Deficit Reduction

Overview
The health of our economy depends on what we do right now to create the conditions where businesses can hire and middle-class families can feel a basic measure of economic security. In the long run, our prosperity also depends on our ability to pay down the massive debt the federal government has accumulated over the past decade. Today, the President sent to the Joint Committee his plan to jumpstart economic growth and job creation now – and to lay the foundation for it continue for years to come.

The President’s Plan for Economic Growth and Deficit Reduction lives up to a simple idea: as a Nation, we can live within our means while still making the investments we need to prosper – from a jobs bill that is needed right now to long-term investments in education, innovation, and infrastructure. It follows a balanced approach: asking everyone to do their part, so no one has to bear all the burden. And it says that everyone – including millionaires and billionaires – has to pay their fair share. Overall, it pays for the President’s jobs bill and produces net savings of more than $3 trillion over the next decade, on top of the roughly $1 trillion in spending cuts that the President already signed into law in the Budget Control Act – for a total savings of more than $4 trillion over the next decade. This would bring the country to a place, by 2017, where current spending is no longer adding to our debt, debt is falling as a share of the economy, and deficits are at a sustainable level.

The American Jobs Act
Tax cuts to help businesses hire and grow

Cutting the payroll tax in half on the first $5 million in payroll, targeting the benefit to the 98 percent of firms with payroll below this threshold.

A complete payroll tax holiday for added workers or increased wages up to $50 million
Extending 100 percent expensing into 2012.

Reforms and regulatory reductions to help entrepreneurs and small businesses access capital.

Putting workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America.

A “Returning Heroes” hiring tax credit for veterans.

Preventing up to 280,000 teacher layoffs, while keeping cops and firefighters on the job

Immediate investments in infrastructure, school buildings, and neighborhoods as well as a bipartisan National Infrastructure Bank.

Pathways back to work for Americans looking for jobs
The most innovative reform to the unemployment insurance program in 40 years and extension of emergency unemployment insurance preventing 6 million Americans looking for work from losing benefits.

A $4,000 tax credit to employers for hiring the long-term unemployed.

Prohibiting employers from discriminating against unemployed workers when hiring
Expanding job opportunities for low-income youth and adults.

Tax relief for every American worker and family
Cutting payroll taxes in half for 160 million workers next year.

Allowing more Americans to refinance their mortgages.

Fully paid for as part of the President’s long-term deficit reduction plan
Paying for Our Investments and Reducing the Deficit

· The plan produces approximately $4.4 trillion in deficit reduction net the cost of the American Jobs Act.

o $1.2 trillion from the discretionary cuts enacted in the Budget Control Act.

o $580 billion in cuts and reforms to a wide range of mandatory programs;

o $1.1 trillion from the drawdown of troops in Afghanistan and transition from a military to a civilian-led mission in Iraq

o $1.5 trillion from tax reform

o $430 billion in additional interest savings

· To spur economic growth and job creation, the plan includes one-time investment and relief in the American Jobs Act. That adds to the deficit in 2012 but is fully paid for over 10 years, and deficit reduction phases in starting in 2013, as the economy grows stronger.

· Deficit reduction is achieved in a balanced approach, with a spending cut to revenue ratio for the entire plan (including discretionary cuts) of 2 to 1.

Deficits and Debt
The Joint Committee plan significantly reduces deficits and puts the country on a fiscally sustainable path by 2017.

The deficit is projected to fall to 2.3 percent of GDP in 2021. By comparison, if we did nothing, the deficit would be 5.5 percent of GDP in 2021.

Reaches “primary balance”-- where our current spending is no longer adding to our debt -- in 2017. At that point, current spending is no longer adding to our debt, debt is falling as a share of the economy, and deficits are at a sustainable level.

The President’s plan would reduce the national debt as a share of economy
Stable or falling debt as a share of the economy is a key metric of fiscal sustainability.
If we did nothing, the national debt would rise to 90.7 percent of GDP in 2021. By contrast, under the President’s plan, the national debt would fall to 73.0 percent of GDP in 2021 -- or an improvement of almost 18 percentage points.

Health Savings
The plan includes $320 billion in health savings that build on the Affordable Care Act to strengthen Medicare and Medicaid by reducing wasteful spending and erroneous payments, and supporting reforms that boost the quality of care. It accomplishes this in a way that does not shift significant risks onto the individuals they serve; slash benefits; or undermine the fundamental compact they represent to our Nation’s seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income families.

The plan includes $248 billion in savings from Medicare
Within this total, 90 percent of the savings, or $224 billion, comes from reducing overpayments in Medicare.

Any savings that affect beneficiaries do not begin until 2017.

The plan does not propose to change the eligibility age for Medicare benefits.

Other health and Medicaid savings amount to $72 billion.

Because of the structural nature of these reforms, health savings grow to over $1 trillion in the second decade.

The President will veto any bill that takes one dime from the Medicare benefits seniors rely on without asking the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations to pay their fair share.

Other Mandatory
The plan includes $250 billion in savings from other mandatory programs. Included within these savings are:

$33 billion in savings from agriculture subsidies, payments, and programs

$42.5 billion in reforms to Federal employee benefit programs, including programs for civilian employees and military personnel.

$4.1 billion from the disposal of unused government assets.

$92.2 billion from restructuring government operations and reducing government liabilities.

$77.6 billion from improving Federal program management and reducing waste and abuse.
Revenues

The President calls on the Committee to undertake comprehensive tax reform, and lays out five principles for it to follow: 1) lower tax rates; 2) cut wasteful loopholes and tax breaks; 3) reduce the deficit by $1.5 trillion; 4) boost job creation and growth; and 5) comport with the “Buffett Rule” that people making more than $1 million a year should not pay a smaller share of their income in taxes than middle-class families pay.

Tax reform should draw on the specific proposals the President has put forward, together with elimination of additional inefficient tax breaks. If the Joint Committee is unable to undertake comprehensive tax reform, the President believes the discrete measures he has proposed should be enacted on a standalone basis. Their enactment as a standalone package still would significantly improve the country’s fiscal standing, represent an important step toward more fundamentally transforming our tax code, and serve as a strong foundation for economic growth and job creation.

To advance this debate, the President is offering a detailed set of specific tax loophole closers and measures to broaden the tax base that, together with the expiration of the high-income tax cuts, would be more than sufficient to hit the $1.5 trillion target. These include:

Allowing the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for upper income earners to expire ($866 billion)
Limiting deductions and exclusions for those making more than $250,000 a year ($410 billion)
Closing loopholes and eliminating special interest tax breaks (approximately $300 billion)

###

read more "President Unveils New Deficit Reduction Plan: White House Fact Sheet"